Why+Government?

** Why Government is needed? **

===To explain why governments are needed we need to know what governments is ** Government ** is the organization, machinery, or agency, through which a political unit exercises its authority, controls and administers public policy, and directs and controls the actions of its members or subjects. ===

in my opinion A government is absolutely necessary in this life.
===We need to be guided a government is a body that has the power to make and enforce laws within an organization or group the primary duty of a government is to reward the people who do good things and punish the wrongdoers. We need a government for a lot of reasons and for that they need to: ===

 · To protect the nation from foreign and domestic enemies and violence.
=== · To provide services like post office, fire protection, state and local police, armed forces, and regulate things like interstate commerce and trade with other nations. === ===A government s decreases the bad things that happens to a country it limits crime by laws, it provides what citizens need like health care and free entertainment like parks and all. ===

"Are people naturally trustworthy or untrustworthy?" Others might ask: "Are people good or bad(evil?) natured  God created humans and for that we obey and serve him, god made us to be good and to follow him. were supposed to be good and trustworthy, what we choose to be is what we become and where you grow up what your parents taught you is affecting you. No one is born to be bad or untrustworthy that’s why there is a right side. for example when you tell your friend a secret you were told not to tell anyone you took that choice so you made the diction to tell the secret, or when criminals kill or steel they made that choice no matter what there going trough unless they are mental. So basically you make choices that affect your life, people are not naturally untrustworthy but trustworthy and it doesn’t happened in a second trust is build with time and if you broke it time will fix it. This is an example I saw in Yahoo answers, This girl said ”if we are naturally GOOD, we would NOT have all the problems in the world we have today and have ALWAYS had. So guess what? They' re naturally BAD” I disagree with her because god made us good, we choose what we want to be, why do we have a happy ending in each book, why we put bad people in jail is all reasons. The destiny of the people who made the choice to be bad in god hands but what other people do is not us what you do is you.

media type="youtube" key="AVsjZBy7hww" height="229" width="285" The word democracy comes from two Greeks words Demos which means People and kratein which means to rule, the rule of the people (Majority role) a group of people, by means of elected representatives of the people, the majority role affects a lot of things, like homes and lives. The word Republic comes from two Greeks words Res which means thing and publica which means public (the republic thing), the law a true republic is one that government is limited by law leaving the people alone, so basically A republic is a type of government where the citizens choose their leaders of their country. I don’t, nothing is perfect, a mistake is meant to be and we are meant to be learn from it, having a group then one ruler is better having a group is better than a law that was made long ago not knowing the changes in this life. This form of a government doesn’t exists in particle sense, it’s always a group that elect one of their member in front. It seems to be ruled by one but in the end the group is. Internet search A form of national government in which the power of the monarch (the king or queen) is restrained by a parliament, by law, or by custom. Several nations, especially in modern times, have passed from absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, including Belgium, Britain, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden.
 * 1) Define democracy.
 * 1) Define Republic.
 * 1) Do you agree with this interpretation of what a democracy is as stated in the video?
 * 1) Define constitutional monarchy.

||
 * 1) List if and why these countries are democracies:
 * Constitutional Monarchy || Democracy? Why or why not? ||
 * Bahrain || Not, with an executive appointed by the king, it’s ruled by one royal family [|Al Khalifa] . Which is kind of a person ||
 * Canada || Yes, Canada is an independent constitutional monarchy, a confederation with parliamentary democracy. ||
 * Saudi Arabia || Not, Saudi Arabia is ruled by a monarchy, who are descendants of the first king of Saudi Arabia, Abdul-Aziz ibn Saud. No political parties or national elections are allowed in Saudi Arabia. From Wikipedia, "Saudi Arabia has no parliament, instead there is a national "Consultative Council" who are 150 Saudi citizens that are appointed by the king for a period of four years to serve as an advisory role”. ||
 * Sweden || Yes, The Constitution states that all public power proceeds from the people and that the Riksdag is the foremost representative of the people. As such, the Riksdag is a crucial component of Swedish democracy.

Economics
|| * free market || Politics
 * Left || Right ||
 * * Mao Communist
 * north korea
 * Margaret Thatcher *Ronald
 * Hitler
 * Saudi
 * India

|| * conservative
 * authoritarian || libertarian ||
 * * liberal
 * Obama
 * Gandhi
 * India
 * Canada
 * U.S
 * Hitler
 * Mao
 * Stalin
 * Mussolini
 * Saudi
 * Thailand
 * Jordan ||

it is difficult to separate the political and economic concept of many leaders and nations into two simple categories. All are mixtures that require interpretation based on events of history or events of the day.

** Revolutionary Thinkers and Politics ** **Anarchists ** A person who believes in or tries to bring about anarchy. Relating to or supporting anarchy or anarchists Emma Goldman, born in 1869, known for her political activism, She played a pivotal role in the development of [|anarchist political philosophy] in [|North America] and [|Europe] in the first half of the twentieth century. Goldman became a writer and a renowned lecturer on anarchist philosophy, women's rights, and social issues, attracting crowds of thousands. Anarchism and free association were to her logical responses to the confines of government control and capitalism As an anarchist, Goldman championed numerous human rights causes, particularly the issue of free speech Widely persecuted for her advocacy of anarchism and opposition to war world I, Goldman was active in the early 20th century free speech movement, seeing freedom of expression as a fundamental necessity for achieving social change. <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Goldman believed that the economic system of capitalism was inimical to human liberty. o ** What should be the relationship between individuals and society? That is: What responsibilities do we have to each other? Can we do as we please? Is society more important than the individuals that make it up? ** Goldman believed that in individuals and thir rights, <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Goldman's anarchism was intensely personal. She believed it was necessary for anarchist thinkers to live their beliefs, demonstrating their convictions with every action and word. "I don't care if a man's theory for tomorrow is correct," she once wrote. "I care if his spirit of today is correct. <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">She believed that the movement on behalf of human liberty must be staffed by liberated humans.  o ** What are the limits of freedom?  ** She said <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">"I want freedom, the right to self-expression, everybody's right to beautiful” and”i <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">demand freedom for both sexes, freedom of action, freedom in love and freedom in motherhood." She believed that the person decides what he wants to do not the government or the society it was an individual <span style="color: #555555; font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Lucida Grande"; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">decision. She didn’t have a limit for freedom <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> o ** Do they ascribe preference to positive over negative freedoms or vice versa? What ontology is this based on? ** She believed that both sexes should be equal, that if men are allowed to sleep with anyone, then females should do it too. And that if men should be educated females should too. o ** Is freedom of speech a good idea, or freedom of action between consenting adults? ** <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">As an anarchist, Goldman championed many human rights causes; particularly the issue of free speech, Goldman was active in the early 20th century free speech movement, seeing freedom of expression as a fundamental necessity for achieving social change. o ** Should any rights should be allowed or limited? ** No  o ** When may government act against the will of a citizen, and when should a citizen act against his or her government? ** She didn’t believe in a government, she defined what she believed as, doing with no government of encouraging the unemployed to take matters into their hands, she didn’t believe in governments taking control but in citizens handling their matters o ** What is the purpose of government? ** <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Georgia; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Government, the dominion of human conduct, <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Georgia; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">represent the stronghold of man's enslavement <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Georgia; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">and all the horrors it entails. o ** What characterizes a good government? ** A government that is equal to both sexes, a government that cares about the citizens more then them selves, a government that believes in freedom of act and speech o ** Theories of Social organization? ** She believes in free love that means she is again marriage even though she did get married by her choice but she said it was a mistake, she also organized many interviews and made lots of speeches, which made people believe in her more. o ** Other information that aided or broadened our understanding of the importance of these ideas today. ** <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">A natural law is that factor in man which asserts itself freely and spontaneously without any external force, in harmony with the requirements of nature. For instance, the demand for nutrition, for sex, for light, air, and exercise, is a natural law. But its expression needs not the machinery of government, needs not the club, the gun, the handcuff, or the prison. To obey such laws, if we may call it obedience, requires only spontaneity and free opportunity. That governments do not maintain themselves through such harmonious factors is proven by the terrible array of violence, force, and coercion all governments use in order to live. This might impact on the way people think about government, they did influence now we know good and bad government we know our rights. They were made by one person Emma is the one who started, today’s society is open minded but back then to get to her point she went to prison more then 4 times She had her own ideas few only joined her, the time that all this started was a dangers and war time, everyone wanted to fight but the government control was stronger, humans believed that every government cared It depends in their ideas and thoughts and what they focused more on. Emma was a women’s right defender if their were a man’s right defender hw would’ve won because men back then had the stronger voice. Socially, politically and scientific, all these are a part of what makes us living in order and for that all of them are affecting us. They affects in our personal and society <span style="color: #555555; font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: "Lucida Grande"; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">decision, Emma would definitely be happy for the progress women made, but not the society and how we are controlled by the rules. <span style="font-family: "Abadi MT Condensed Light"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Helvetica; mso-bidi-font-size: 13.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">during her life, Goldman was lionized as a free-thinking "rebel woman" by admirers, and derided by critics as an advocate of politically motivated murder and violent revolution. Her writing and lectures spanned a wide variety of issues, including prisons, a theism, freedom of speech, militarism, capitalism, marriage, free love, and homosexuality. she developed new ways of incorporating gender politics into anarchism. After decades of obscurity, Goldman's iconic status was revived in the 1970s, when feminist and anarchist scholars rekindled popular interest in her life.
 * Who was your character and what were they known for? **
 * What was the impact of these ideas then and how have they influenced the way we see things now? **
 * How were their ideas different from established ideas of the day? **
 * How or why did time and place bias your character’s ideas or another’s responses to their ideas? **
 * Would any one of these thinkers be considered the more significant than another? Give two examples of who, and why? **
 * What present day revolutions in thinking (social, political or scientific) are taking place? How are they influencing the way we live? Will this have an effect on the way we think politics should work? Would your thinker support these new ideas? **
 * Provide a summary of why your thinker is considered revolutionary. **